Best NestJS Boilerplates in 2026: Complete Comparison
Why Use a NestJS Boilerplate?
Building a SaaS from scratch means weeks of wiring up authentication, payment processing, database migrations, email services, and deployment pipelines before writing a single line of business logic. A good boilerplate eliminates that overhead.
But not all boilerplates are equal. Some give you a half-baked Express wrapper. Others lock you into opinionated patterns that don't scale. We tested six popular NestJS boilerplates in 2026 to help you pick the right one.
What We Evaluated
We scored each boilerplate on five criteria:
- Authentication — JWT, OAuth, refresh tokens, role-based access
- Payments — Stripe integration, subscription management, webhooks
- Multi-tenancy — Tenant isolation, data scoping, onboarding
- Frontend — Included dashboard, component quality, responsiveness
- Deployment — Docker, CI/CD, cloud-readiness out of the box
Cloudrix SaaS Starter ships with this pre-configured and tested.
Skip weeks of boilerplate — auth, payments, multi-tenancy, and deployment included out of the box.
Try the live demo →The Contenders
1. Syndrom
Syndrom is a popular NestJS + React boilerplate focused on speed of development. It ships with Prisma, basic JWT auth, and a minimal React dashboard.
Pros: Fast setup, clean codebase, good documentation. Cons: No Stripe integration out of the box. No multi-tenancy. React-only frontend. Limited to single-database architecture.
Best for: Solo developers building simple MVPs.
2. Nzoni
Nzoni targets the African market with localized payment integrations and a NestJS + Angular stack. It includes M-Pesa and Flutterwave alongside Stripe.
Pros: Regional payment support, Angular frontend, decent auth. Cons: Niche payment focus may not apply globally. Documentation is sparse. No multi-tenancy support. Deployment guides are Linux-only.
Best for: Developers targeting African markets.
3. NestJS-Boilerplate (by vndevteam)
A community-maintained boilerplate with TypeORM, Swagger docs, and basic RBAC. It's been around since 2020 and has a loyal following.
Pros: Mature, well-tested, good TypeORM integration, Swagger auto-generation. Cons: No frontend included. No payment integration. No multi-tenancy. You're building the dashboard yourself.
Best for: Backend-only projects that need a solid API foundation.
4. Awesome NestJS Boilerplate
Another community project focused on developer experience. Ships with PostgreSQL, Redis, health checks, and comprehensive testing setup.
Pros: Excellent testing infrastructure, health monitoring, Redis caching. Cons: No frontend. No payments. No tenant management. You get a great backend skeleton but build everything else yourself.
Best for: Teams that want a clean backend starting point with strong testing patterns.
5. Restly
A newer entrant combining NestJS with Next.js. Focuses on API-first development with auto-generated OpenAPI specs and a Next.js admin panel.
Pros: Modern stack, good API documentation, SSR-ready frontend. Cons: Next.js adds complexity for teams that prefer Angular. Stripe integration is basic (one-time payments only). No subscription management. No multi-tenancy.
Best for: Teams committed to the Next.js ecosystem.
6. SaaS Starter (Cloudrix)
Full-stack NestJS + Angular boilerplate built specifically for B2B SaaS. Ships with complete auth (JWT + Google OAuth + refresh tokens), Stripe subscriptions with webhook handling, schema-based multi-tenancy, an Angular dashboard with Tailwind, and Docker deployment.
Pros: Most complete feature set. True multi-tenancy with tenant isolation. Full Stripe subscription lifecycle. Production-ready auth with refresh token rotation. Nx monorepo for shared types. Angular 19+ with standalone components and signals. Cons: Angular-specific (not ideal if your team only knows React). Premium tier required for advanced features.
Best for: Teams building production B2B SaaS who want to skip 2-6 weeks of infrastructure work.
Feature Comparison Table
| Feature | Syndrom | Nzoni | vndevteam | Awesome | Restly | SaaS Starter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JWT Auth | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| OAuth (Google) | No | No | No | No | No | Yes |
| Refresh Tokens | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes |
| Stripe Subscriptions | No | Basic | No | No | One-time | Full lifecycle |
| Webhook Handling | No | No | No | No | No | Yes |
| Multi-tenancy | No | No | No | No | No | Yes |
| Frontend Dashboard | React | Angular | None | None | Next.js | Angular |
| Tailwind CSS | Yes | No | N/A | N/A | Yes | Yes |
| Docker | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Nx Monorepo | No | No | No | No | No | Yes |
| Shared Types | No | No | No | No | Partial | Yes |
| Email Service | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes |
Our Recommendation
If you're building a B2B SaaS product and want the most complete starting point, SaaS Starter covers the most ground. You get auth, payments, multi-tenancy, and a production-ready frontend without stitching together five different tutorials.
The free version on GitHub gives you the core stack. The Pro version adds Stripe subscriptions, multi-tenancy, email templates, and deployment configs — the pieces that typically take the longest to build yourself.
Get Started Today
All of these patterns are fully implemented in SaaS Starter. Skip 2-6 weeks of setup — auth, payments, multi-tenancy, deployment all done.
- Free version: GitHub
- Pro ($249): Get SaaS Starter Pro